Getting latest data loading
Home / Blog / blog / The calm after the strike

This report is not a personal recommendation and does not take into account your personal circumstances or appetite for risk.

The calm after the strike

Heightened geopolitical risk following overnight US military intervention in Syria offers a timely reminder about trading and investing. It also provides us with a welcome positive takeaway that markets would appear to be overlooking into the weekend. One that could ultimately help reignite the Trump trade to record highs.

030322-N-1035L-006 Central Command Area of Operation (Mar. 22, 2003) -- The guided missile destroyer USS Milius (DDG 69) launches a Tomahawk Land Attack Missile (TLAM) toward Iraq during the initial stages of the Operation Iraqi Freedom. Milius is homeported in San Diego, Calif. Operation Iraqi Freedom is the multinational coalition effort to liberate the Iraqi people, eliminate IraqÕs weapons of mass destruction, and end the regime of Saddam Hussein. U.S. Navy photo by PhotographerÕs Mate 1st Class Thomas Lynaugh. (RELEASED)

Last night’s market reaction reminds us of the asset classes that investors regard as safe havens. Gains for precious metals like Gold and Silver were no surprise, although it’s the former that has outperformed with a bullish breakout to levels last seen in the wake of the US election. The latter is up on the day, but has yet to clear 2017 highs.

Other preferred ‘ports for a storm’ include the Japanese Yen which re-tested its best levels against the US Dollar since mid-November. The Swiss Franc was also bid, but less pronounced. And both are already well off day highs due to a US Dollar rebound that is explained in more detail later on. Sovereign bonds also benefited, but like the Swiss Franc, only mildly. Which brings me nicely to my second point.

Markets have done anything but panic. In fact they are suspiciously calm. The safe haven moves are far from what we have seen the past when investors really got spooked and Gold put on 10s of dollars. The equity sell-off has already eased; the UK UK Index is well off its lows, now posting gains, while the German DAX trying its best to recover lost ground. Which says a lot.

Waning belief in the Trump trade after a failed Healthcare bill proposal saw equities pull back from March record highs. Investors are perhaps taking solace from the new US President’s willingness to intervene in Syria, suggesting he’s maybe not as inward looking as thought, and prepared to do what it takes at home as well as abroad. Might he be prepared to soften his stance on China, offering us something positive regarding trade during day 2 of the Trump-Xi meeting, even after the Syria move? Could this allow markets to regain their bullish composure and reignite the trump trade next week?

A mixed jobs report is even helping sentiment into the weekend. A disappointing headline Non-Farm Payrolls print (rebound next month?) is being made up for by the lowest unemployment rate in almost 10yrs coupled with solid participation and wages growth. This suggests an ever-tightening labour market conditions which would allow the US Federal Reserve to maintain its path of monetary policy normalisation through further interest rate hikes this year. Which it will only do if it is sure the economy can handle it.

Markets would still welcome any gift-wrapped good news on US fiscal stimulus such as infrastructure spending, tax cuts and deregulation to spur on US Inc in the hope that it helps bring global economies up with it. It could well be that we have to wait until late summer for any concrete proof. However, if last night allows investors shift focus from their recent discontent at a lack of policy progress to a more tempered opinion of Trump’s protectionist pledges, we know only too well how they are prepared to run with that, potentially for several months.

This was the first major event of Trump’s young presidency. Could it be this that ultimately defines him on an international stage, and pre-occupies markets for the foreseeable until he can deliver what he promised?

Accendo Markets prides itself on the quality of its research as well as its client service. As well as winning Best CFD provider for a ninth straight year in the City of London Wealth Management Awards we were also recently voted Best CFD Research Service in 2017’s ADVFN International Financial Awards. If you’d like to see why, sign up to receive it permanently and see why our clients appreciate it so much.

As always, have a great weekend. I’ll be back after Easter.

Mike van Dulken, Head of Research, 7 April 2017

« Back to Category

This research is produced by Accendo Markets Limited. Research produced and disseminated by Accendo Markets is classified as non-independent research, and is therefore a marketing communication. This investment research has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote its independence and it is not subject to the prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. This research does not constitute a personal recommendation or offer to enter into a transaction or an investment, and is produced and distributed for information purposes only.

Accendo Markets considers opinions and information contained within the research to be valid when published, and gives no warranty as to the investments referred to in this material. The income from the investments referred to may go down as well as up, and investors may realise losses on investments. The past performance of a particular investment is not necessarily a guide to its future performance. Prepared by Michael van Dulken, Head of Research

Comments are closed.

Spread bets and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage.
Spread bets and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 67% of retail investor accounts lose money when spread betting and/or trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how spread bets and CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
.